Many artists and arts organizations have become familiar with the requirement from partner organizations, especially school boards, for police background checks for artists and others who work with children and youth. This is a good first step but is no longer sufficient.
Understanding has changed about the nature of the potential risk, who exactly is at risk and how best to prevent or reduce the chances of harm.
This is general information to artists and arts organizations about their evolving responsibility when delivering arts programs in their own premises as well as in educational and community settings. Requirements around what is now called a “vulnerable sector check” are not well established and can be confusing. Arts organizations and artists must keep themselves informed of these requirements as they may change from year to year in partner organizations and police services.
We have included the definition of vulnerable persons, a discussion about vulnerable sector checks and an explanation of different types of police background reports. There is also information about the Human Rights Code, privacy law, liability and insurance, as applicable to the screening of people who work with vulnerable persons. Finally, there are links to online resources for more detailed information.
All arts organizations receiving OAC operating support must establish their own safe programming policy and practices which should consider a vulnerable sector check as part of a broader screening process to protect vulnerable participants in their arts programs.
Although most of this information applies to arts organizations, it is important that individual artists, ad hoc groups and collectives understand these requirements, whether they work independently in settings with vulnerable people or are engaged by arts organizations to work in schools and communities.
Back to top ↑
Individual artists, ad hoc groups, collectives and organizations applying to OAC project programs should use a police background check or vulnerable sector check as one of their tools to screen artists, staff members or volunteers having direct, ongoing, close contact with vulnerable persons. A police background check or vulnerable sector check needs to be obtained prior to the beginning of a project funded by OAC.
If working with a community partner, discuss with your partner whether artists and volunteers need to obtain a police background check or vulnerable sector check. If an employee or volunteer will have only casual contact with vulnerable persons, a check may not be necessary. This is a requirement that appears in the Terms and Conditions for receipt of funds in all OAC project programs.
Organizations receiving OAC operating support must have developed a safe programming policy and a set of procedures, which should consider a police background check or vulnerable sector verification (whichever is required by your community partners or determined to be the most applicable for the context of the work) for every artist, staff member, or volunteer engaged in programming involving vulnerable persons. These requirements appear in the Terms and Conditions for receipt of funds in all OAC operating programs.
Vulnerable members of society are defined in the Criminal Records Act as persons who, because of age, disability, or other circumstances, whether temporary or permanent are:
This includes children, youth, senior citizens, people with physical, developmental, social, emotional, or other disabilities, as well as people who are victims of crime or harm. The vulnerability may be a temporary condition or permanent.
Vulnerable sector screening is a confusing phrase as it can refer to two different processes.
It is a new term for a broader, more comprehensive approach to risk reduction taken by organizations in the social service, recreation, health care and education sectors. In this sense of the phrase, it is the internal human resource process of an organization to screen workers and volunteers to determine their suitability for working with vulnerable persons.
The same term (or the term “vulnerable sector check”) is used by the RCMP and local police departments to describe reports that go beyond a person’s criminal record to include other information, and may involve fingerprint identification.
In this document, a vulnerable sector screening refers to a broad program, including policies and procedures, established by an organization to ensure the safety of vulnerable peoples who are engaged in their programs.
In this document, a vulnerable sector check refers to the specific background check which extends beyond a police record check.
A vulnerable sector screening program within an organization is an internal process, outlined in a human resource policy, designed to identify a person (whether a paid worker or a volunteer) who is not suitable to work with vulnerable persons or who may harm or mistreat them. This program will often include a police background check or vulnerable sector verification, renewed on a regular basis, but should also include other elements.
If you have a formal recruitment process, conduct personal interviews before hiring, and always check references for the artists, staff and volunteers who deliver your programs for schools and communities, then your organization already has some of the elements of a screening program in place.
Other steps could include an orientation or training program to alert your workers and volunteers to the special challenges of working with vulnerable groups and your organization’s expectations for ethical behaviour, a written policy which describes your organization’s expectations for those working with vulnerable groups, and a regular system of getting feedback from vulnerable program participants in order to learn of problems as soon as they occur.
By formalizing the steps you already take, and adding a few others, you can reduce the likelihood that an unsuitable person is recruited by your organization and does harm to your vulnerable sector program participants.
Organizations beginning a vulnerable sector screening program are advised to require existing workers and volunteers to go through the same process as new recruits, including police background checks or vulnerable sector verification. This sends a clear message throughout the organization about expectations and standards.
The Volunteer Canada website provides a good starting place for vulnerable sector screening policy and practice. While its focus is screening volunteers in the social service, recreation and health sectors, this information can be adapted by the arts sector for its professional artists, staff, and volunteers.
Police background checks or vulnerable sector checks, as part of an overall vulnerable sector screening program, are commonly understood as a way of screening out sexual predators. Sexual abuse is not the only risk to vulnerable people. For example, a history of theft, fraud, or embezzlement may be relevant if the arts program provides the opportunity for an individual to ingratiate himself or herself over time with a vulnerable group for the purpose of fraud or extortion.
As resources are limited, an organization should determine the level of risk to program participants and design an appropriate screening process for each level:
An organization could set a policy, for example, that police background checks are required depending on the duration and frequency of contact with vulnerable persons and exempt workers and volunteers who are in the low risk category.
Similarly, an organization could decide that those workers or volunteers who are continuously engaged with the organization do not have to renew their police background checks unless there are significant gaps in service (perhaps a 12-month period) or unless their partner organizations require it. Instead, for the sake of efficiency, these people could sign an annual declaration affirming that they have not been charged with any criminal offence since their police background check.
Arts organizations must understand the expectations of their partner organizations, whether schools or community organizations, and design screening programs to meet the requirements of the partner organizations.
Ensembles that enter the school or community organization as a group to give a performance under the supervision of teachers or the staff of the community organization are sometimes excused from the requirement of having a police background check for each individual in the group. Those artists within a larger group who provide workshops or directly engage with students are expected to have police background checks. There is an expectation that ensembles and individuals working closely with vulnerable persons, even under a teacher’s supervision or the supervision of the community organization, have been screened by the arts organization which engages them.
This is a name-based report prepared by a police service at the request of an individual or an organization, with the written consent of the subject who is required to produce two pieces of photo identification. This report is generally part of the requirement for workers and volunteers whose activities bring them into contact with vulnerable persons. It can also be used to screen for other types of jobs unrelated to vulnerable persons.
Terminology is confusing here. Police background checks are also sometimes called criminal record checks, police reference checks, police record checks, criminal reference checks, or criminal background checks.
The report issued by the police service, after checking the national police database, may be called a clearance letter. Practice may differ in different municipalities. Whatever it is called, the search of the police database is based on name rather than fingerprints.
As practice varies in different jurisdictions, no matter which of the above terms is used, it is possible that the police report may cover more than a person’s criminal record, including such information as: complaints made by or about an individual, information about an individual’s mental health, information about pending charges and charges that resulted in acquittal or other non-conviction disposition, any prohibitions to do with firearms or driving, or allegations of child or spousal abuse.
Local police agencies use the national database of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police which is called the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) for police background checks.
This is a police report based on fingerprint identification. This kind of report is required for such things as adoptions; some foreign visas and travel documents; some jobs with government, private industry and the police; immigration applications; and citizenship applications. It is also sometimes used as the second stage of the Vulnerable Sector Verification for workers and volunteers whose activity brings them into contact with vulnerable persons.
This is a report prepared by a police service that, in addition to the information that is gathered for the police background check, determines the possible existence of a criminal record and/or sexual offence conviction for which an individual has received a pardon.
It is a report that begins with name-based identification but may also require fingerprint identification.
A Vulnerable Sector Verification is conducted solely for the purpose of screening workers and volunteers whose activity brings them into contact with vulnerable persons. Before proceeding, the police service must verify that the job or position is related to vulnerable persons.
There are two situations when fingerprints may be required as part of a Vulnerable Sector Verification. First, if the name-based search indicates that an individual has a criminal record, the individual must submit fingerprints to verify identity.
Second, if the CPIC database flags a match from pardoned criminal and pardoned sexual offender records based on the gender and date of birth of the applicant, the individual must submit fingerprints to verify identity. This is to avoid a situation where a person obtains a legal name change and this change is not reported to the RCMP for updating the criminal record information. That could mean that an organization is unable to link someone to a pardoned criminal record or pardoned sexual offense that may be relevant to suitability for working with vulnerable persons.
Organizations in the social services, health, education and recreation sectors may now require this level of record check to be sure that pardoned offenders are identified before they have a chance to connect with vulnerable persons. Arts organizations should be aware that their partners in education and community organizations may begin to ask for Vulnerable Sector Verifications instead of police background checks.
Although this sounds onerous, arts organizations should keep in mind that in nearly all cases, a match will not be found and no fingerprints will be required.
The kind of police report you need depends on the policy of your partner school or community organization. Some organizations are satisfied with a police background check; others now require a Vulnerable Sector Verification.
To obtain a police report:
An arts organization should not request a police background check or a vulnerable sector verification until it has decided that the person is otherwise suitable for the position (whether paid or volunteer) and has made an offer of engagement, conditional on a satisfactory police check. The police background check should be limited to information that is relevant to suitability for the position or work in question. The information about the individual is subject to Canada’s privacy laws and the organization must use it appropriately and keep it confidential.
The police will not conduct a background check unless an individual applies on his or her own behalf or has provided consent in writing to the arts organization making the background check. If the latter, the arts organization is responsible for checking at least two pieces of photo identification.
The police will generally provide the report to the subject first, letting the person decide whether to proceed or not. The person may ask the police to clarify, revise, suppress, or remove information in the record; or he or she may choose to discuss with the arts organization the information in the report that may be of concern to it.
Police background checks cost between $15 and $60. Often the individual is required to pay the fee. Some organizations pay the fee on behalf of applicants they are screening. Some organizations make an arrangement with their local police agency to screen volunteers at no charge.
It can take two weeks to ten weeks, depending on the jurisdiction, to get a police background check or vulnerable sector verification. If finger-print verification is required, it can take up to 120 days.
Police background checks and vulnerable sector verifications have an important but limited use. Some abusers and offenders have records in other countries that are not captured in the CPIC database. There are sometimes gaps in Canadian police records if a conviction has not yet been registered. If the person was pardoned or convicted under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, information will not be available.
In any case, many abusers and sex offenders have never been convicted of a crime. As some incidents of inappropriate or harmful behaviour never reach the attention of the police, other ways must be in place to detect them.
For this reason, arts organizations are advised to have a broader vulnerable sector screening program within their organizations as part of their human resource policy and practice.
While organizations have a responsibility to screen workers and volunteers who work with vulnerable persons, they must also abide by the Human Rights Code. The code requires that police background checks only be requested when it is reasonable because of the job or volunteer position and that the scope of checks be restricted to relevant issues. An individual’s consent is required prior to doing a police background check.
Arts organizations are subject to Canada’s privacy law (the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act or PIPEDA) that requires organizations to use or disclose personal information reasonably and appropriately and take appropriate measures to hold that information secure. Information from police background checks or vulnerable sector verification falls into this category.
Individual artists, workers and volunteers can be found liable and required to pay damages if they harm someone while doing their work. Non-profit and charitable organizations may be held accountable by the courts for the actions of their workers or volunteers and the harm to their vulnerable program participants.
Even if an incident does not reach the courts, it could cause turmoil and confusion within an organization. It could also damage the reputation of the individuals and organization if the matter becomes public. The Board of Directors is responsible, with input from staff, for ensuring that organizational policies are established around screening. Staff is responsible for designing appropriate screening processes, applying them consistently, and taking action to remove individuals who are not suited to work with vulnerable persons.
Artists and arts organizations cannot count on insurance to provide a safety net and resolve problems. In some cases, coverage may be dependent on an organization’s screening policies and procedures. If an organization has been negligent, the insurance company may not provide coverage. In any case, insurance can only provide a partial remedy after the harm is committed. It should be the priority to protect vulnerable persons in the first place, not to compensate them after the harm is done.